SEMINARS
Updated: 4-27-2011

   

APRIL 2011

   
Ergodic Theory and Statistical Mechanics Seminar
Topic: Polynomials in the Poisson scaling regime and gaps in n^(1/3) mod 1
Presenter: Ilya Vinogradov, Princeton University
Date: Thursday, April 28, 2011, Time: 2:00 p.m., Location: Fine Hall 801
Abstract: I will show that a quadratic polynomial exhibits "random" behavior on the circle in the Poisson scaling regime. Specifically I will prove that second moments are Poissonian and motivate why other moments could be Poissonian. An essential feature of the polynomial under consideration is that it has a sufficiently "random" constant term. In the corresponding exponential sum the main term will not come from "major arcs" but from other points. Finally, I will relate this problem to gaps in n^(1/3) mod 1 and show that Poisson moments (only two moments known at this time) for a specific quadratic polynomial imply exponential distribution for gaps.
   
Discrete Mathematics Seminar
Topic: Tournament pathwidth and topological containment
Presenter: Alexandra Fradkin, Princeton University
Date: Thursday, April 28, 2011, Time: 2:15 p.m., Location: Fine Hall 224
Abstract: In this talk we will prove that for a set S of tournaments the following three statements are equivalent: - there exists k such that all members of S have pathwidth less than k; - there exists k such that no member of S contains k vertices that are pairwise k-connected; - there exists a digraph H such that no member of S contains a subdivision of H. As a consequence, we obtain a polynomial time algorithm to test whether a tournament contains a subdivision of a fixed digraph H. We note that the equivalent problem in general digraphs is NP-complete. Joint work with Paul Seymour.
   
Algebraic Topology Seminar
Topic: Integral and Rigid Elliptic Genera
Presenter: Victor Buchstaber, Steklov Mathematical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences
Date: Thursday, April 28, 2011, Time: 3:00 p.m., Location: Fine Hall 314
Abstract:

see http://www.math.princeton.edu/~seminar/2010-11-sem/BuchstaberAbstract4-28-2011.pdf

 

 
Joint Princeton University and IAS Number Theory Seminar **please note special location**
Topic: Serre´s conjectures on the number of rational points of bounded height
Presenter: P. Salberger, Chalmers University
Date: Thursday, April 28, 2011, Time: 4:30 p.m., Location: S-101 at IAS
Abstract: We give a survey of recent results on conjectures of Heath-Brown and Serre on the asymptotic density of rational points of bounded height. The main tool in the proofs is a new global determinant method inspired by the local real and p-adic determinant methods of Bombieri-Pila and Heath-Brown.
   
Topology Seminar
Topic: Computational aspects of bordered Floer homology
Presenter: Peter Ozsvath, MIT
Date: Thursday, April 28, 2011, Time: 4:30 p.m., Location: Fine Hall 314
Abstract: I will give a brief outline of bordered Floer homology, and explain how it can be used to describe aspects of Heegaard Floer homology. I will pay special emphasis on the branched double-covers of links in $S3$. This is joint work with Robert Lipshitz and Dylan Thurston.
   
Differential Geometry and Geometric Analysis Seminar
Topic: Parabolic equations and the Ricci flow on manifolds with boundary
Presenter: Artem Pulemotov, University of Chicago
Date: Friday, April 29, 2011, Time: 3:00 p.m., Location: Fine Hall 314
Abstract: In the first part of the talk, we will focus on a second-order quasilinear parabolic equation in a vector bundle over a compact manifold~$M$ with boundary. Our goal is to explore the short-time existence of solutions to this equation. In the second part, we will discuss the Ricci flow on~$M$. The objective is to propose a new boundary condition for the flow and state two short-time existence results.
   
MAY 2011
   
Algebraic Geometry Seminar
Topic: On the three compactifications of Siegel space
Presenter: Valery Alexeev, University of Georgia
Date: Tuesday, May 3, 2011, Time: 4:30 p.m., Location: Fine Hall 322
Abstract: The moduli space of $A_g$ of abelian varieties has three classical toroidal compactifications: (1) perfect, (2) 2nd Voronoi, and (3) Igusa blowup, each with its own distinct geometric meaning. It is an interesting problem to understand exactly how these compactifications are related. I will show that (1) and (2) are isomorphic in a neighborhood of the image of a regular map from the Deligne-Mumford's moduli space $\bar M_g$, and that the rational map $\bar M_g \to \bar A_g$ for (3) is not regular for $g>8$. This is a joint work with Adrian Brunyate.
   
Topology Seminar
Topic: TBA
Presenter: Liam Watson, UCLA
Date: Thursday, May 5, 2011, Time: 4:30 p.m., Location: Fine Hall 314
   
Differential Geometry and Geometric Analysis Seminar
Topic: TBA
Presenter: Yannick Slre, Universite de Aix-Marseille III
Date: Friday, May 6, 2011, Time: 3:00 p.m., Location: Fine Hall 314
   
Department Colloquium
Topic: Higher order Fourier analysis
Presenter: Balazs Szegedy, University of Toronto
Date: Wednesday, May 11, 2011, Time: 4:30 p.m., Location: Fine Hall 314
Abstract: In a famous paper Timothy Gowers introduced a sequence of norms U(k) defined for functions on abelian groups. He used these norms to give quantitative bounds for Szemeredi's theorem on arithmetic progressions. The behavior of the U(2) norm is closely tied to Fourier analysis. In this talk we present a generalization of Fourier analysis (called k-th order Fourier analysis) that is related in a similar way to the U(k+1) norm. Ordinary Fourier analysis deals with homomorphisms of abelian groups into the circle group. We view k-th order Fourier analysis as a theory which deals with morphisms of abelian groups into algebraic structures that we call "k-step nilspaces". These structeres are variants of structures introduced by Host and Kra (called parallelepiped structures) and they are close relatives of nil-manifolds. Our approach has two components. One is an uderlying algebraic theory of nilspaces and the other is a variant of ergodic theory on ultra product groups. Using this theory, we obtain inverse theorems for the U(k) norms on arbitrary abelian groups that generalize results by Green, Tao and Ziegler. As a byproduct we also obtain an interesting limit theory for functions on abelian groups in the spirit of the recently developed graph limit theory.
   
Topology Seminar
Topic: A Heegaard Floer characterization of Borromean knots
Presenter: Yi Ni, Caltech
Date: Thursday, May 12, 2011, Time: 4:30 p.m., Location: Fine Hall 314
Abstract: If the total rank of the knot Floer homology of a knot is equal to the total rank of the Heegaard Floer (hat) homology of the ambient 3-manifold, we say that the knot has simple knot Floer homology (or the knot is Floer simple). It is known that the unknot is the only Floer simple knot in S3. However, the question of determining all the Floer simple knots in general 3-manifolds is far from being solved. In this talk we will answer this question for the connected sums of S1\times S2: Such knots are essentially the Borromean knots.
   
Algebraic Geometry Seminar
Topic: Theta Functions
Presenter: Hershal Farkas, Hebrew University of Jewish Law
Date: Tuesday, May 17, 2011, Time: 4:30 p.m., Location: Fine Hall 322
Abstract: In this talk we consider Weierstrass points for the linear space of meromorphic functions on a compact Riemann surface whose divisors are multiples of $\frac{1}{P_0^{\alpha}P_1..P_{g-1}} where the points $P_i$ are points on the surface and $\alpha$ is a positive integer for which there is no holomorphic differential whose divisor is a multiple of $P_0^{\alpha)P_1..P_{g-1}$. Thus by the Riemann Roch theorem the dimension of the space is precisely $\alpha$. It develops that here are two different ways to define the Weierstrass points for this space. One way is to consider the Wronskian determinant of a basis for the space and to define the Weierstrass points as the zeros of the Wronskian and the weight of the Weierstrass point as the order of the zero. Another way is to consider, for a suitably chosen $ e \in C^g$, the Riemann theta function $ \theta(\alpha \Phi_{P_0}(P)-e)$ as a multivalued function on the surface, to define the Weierstrass points as its zeros and the weight of the Weierstrass point as the order of the zero. In this talk we deal with the question of whether to two definitions agree. We show that the sets of zeros are indeed the same and the problem is to detrmine whether the weights are the same. We give a partial solution to this problem.