Instructor in applied mathematics at Princeton University

I joined the mathematics department at Princeton University
on Feb. 1^{st}, 2016 as an instructor. There, I
interact also with PACM, the program in applied mathematics,
in particular with Amit
Singer.

Prior to that,

- Postdoc at Inria in Paris, affiliated with the computer science department of the Ecole Normale Supérieure with Alexandre d'Aspremont in the SIERRA team, working on topics at the intersection of optimization and statistics. (Oct. 2014–Jan. 2016);
- Ph.D. working with Pierre-Antoine Absil and Vincent Blondel at UCLouvain, in the department of mathematical engineering. My dissertation is about optimization and estimation on manifolds. (Oct. 2010–Sep. 2014).

I am interested in **nonconvex optimization**
and **optimization on manifolds.** For the
latter, I develop a
toolbox called Manopt. A reference in this field is the
book Optimization
Algorithms on Matrix Manifolds. Selection of research
topics:

- Nonconvex optimization
- Synchronization (estimation from pairwise information)
- Semidefinite programs and relaxations with underlying smoothness
- Low-rank optimization
- curve fitting on manifolds (master thesis)

Manopt, available at manopt.org,
is a user-friendly, open source and **documented **Matlab
toolbox which can be used to leverage the power of modern
Riemannian optimization algorithms with ease. Manopt won the ORBEL
Wolsey Award 2014 for best open source operational
research implementation.

Consider a compact semidefinite program (SDP) of the form

$$\min_X \operatorname{Tr}(CX) \textrm{ s.t. } \mathcal{A}(X) = b, X \succeq 0,$$

where $X$ is a positive semidefinite matrix of size $n$ and $\mathcal{A}$ is a linear operator capturing $m$ equality constraints. For example, if the constraints are $\mathrm{diag}(X) = \mathbf{1}$ (diagonal entries of $X$ all equal 1) and $C$ is the adjacency matrix of a graph, then this is the Max-Cut SDP relaxation for that graph. Parameterizing $X$ as $X = YY^t$ yields a nonconvex optimization problem in $Y$:

$$\min_{Y \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times p}} \operatorname{Tr}(CYY^t) \textrm{ s.t. } \mathcal{A}(YY^t) = b.$$

Afonso, Vlad and I showed that if the set of acceptable $Y$'s is a manifold, and if $Y$ has sufficiently many columns, then, generically in $C$ (the cost matrix), second-order necessary optimality conditions for $Y$ are sufficient for global optimality. In other words: the nonconvex problem in $Y$ can be solved (and solves the SDP).

Synchronization is the problem of estimating elements $g_1, \ldots, g_N$ in a group $G$, given measurements of relative quantities: $h_{ij} \approx g_i^{}g_j^{-1}$. These elements are best visualized on a graph (undirected), where each element $g_i$ is a node and there exists an edge between two nodes $g_i$ and $g_j$ if a measurement $h_{ij}$ is available. I focus on $G = \mathrm{SO}(n)$, the group of rotations:

$$\mathrm{SO}(n) = \{ R \in \mathbb{R}^{n\times n} \colon R^TR = I_n \ \mathrm{ and } \ \operatorname{det}(R) = +1 \}.$$

SynchronizeMLE is the distribution of Matlab codes for this project, available under BSD license. It contains code both to perform the estimation and to compute Cramér-Rao bounds.

This is an algorithm to compute KKT points for problems of the form $$\min_X f(X)$$ with $X$ a symmetric matrix of size $n\times n$ such that $$X\succeq 0 \textrm{ and } X_{ii} = I_d \ \forall i,$$ meaning that the $d\times d$ diagonal blocks of $X$ are identity matrices. The cost function $f$ must be twice continuously differentiable. If $f$ is convex, KKT points are global optimizers.

The main idea is to attain a solution by tracking intermediate solutions of low rank, increasing the rank as needed. This is in contrast with interior point methods, which work with full-rank matrices to ultimately converge to (often) low-rank solutions.

Here is Matlab code for the Riemannian staircase method. It is readily usable to solve such problems with $f(X) = \operatorname{Trace}(CX)$ and a pseudo-Huber-loss smoothed version of $f(X) = \sum_{(i,j)\in E} \|C_{ij}Y_j - Y_i\|_F$ (notice the absence of square). These two functions are concave (the linear cost is also convex), which promotes solutions at extreme points. The latter have low rank. See also my slides and the full paper:

Let $M \in \mathbb{R}^{m\times n}$ be a matrix with low rank $r \ll \min(m, n)$. Low-rank matrix completion is the task of estimating (or recovering) $M$ from measurements $\hat M_{ij} \approx M_{ij}$ of a few entries $(i, j) \in \Omega$.

At NIPS 2011, we proposed RTRMC, a Riemannian trust-region method for low-rank matrix completion:

In this project, which was the topic of my master's
thesis, we are given time-labeled points on a Riemannian
manifold $\mathcal{M}$ (for example, on a sphere, on the group
of rotations, on the set of positive-definite matrices, etc.):
$p_1, \ldots, p_n$, associated to timestamps $t_1 \leq \ldots
\leq t_n$. The goal is to propose a curve (a model) on the
manifold, $\gamma \colon [t_1, t_n] \to \mathcal{M}$, **such
that the curve fits the data** (exactly for
interpolation, reasonably for regression): $\gamma(t_i)
\approx p_i$ **and **such that $\gamma$ **is
smooth** in some suitable sense. Interpolation and
regression are fundamental operations in signals processing.
They serve the goals of** denoising and resampling
acquired data**. These tasks are well understood when
the data belongs to a Euclidean space such as $\mathbb{R}^n$,
but much less so **when the data belon****g****s
to a nonlinear manifold**.

Fine Hall, Dptmt of Mathematics

Washington Road

Princeton, NJ 08540

United States

Office: 607 (6

E-mail: nboumal@math.princeton.edu

At UCL, my office mate was Romain
Hollanders.

In Paris, my office mates were Amit Bermanis, Damien Scieur and Vianney Perchet.

My Erdös number is 3, courtesy of my co-author and PhD advisor Vincent Blondel.

Research will get you places! It got me in: Palo Alto, Boston, Princeton, London, Prague, Cannes, Lisbon, Milan, Dagstuhl, Granada, Sierra Nevada, Valencia, Berlin, Les Houches, Costa da Caparica, Paris, Florence, San Diego, Bordeaux, Montréal, Bonn, Pittsburgh, Oxford, Geneva, New York City, Barcelona, Vancouver, Ames... and various places in Belgium (Louvain-la-Neuve, Leuven, Liège, La Roche, Mons, Knokke, Daverdisse, Spa, Namur...).

In Paris, my office mates were Amit Bermanis, Damien Scieur and Vianney Perchet.

My Erdös number is 3, courtesy of my co-author and PhD advisor Vincent Blondel.

Research will get you places! It got me in: Palo Alto, Boston, Princeton, London, Prague, Cannes, Lisbon, Milan, Dagstuhl, Granada, Sierra Nevada, Valencia, Berlin, Les Houches, Costa da Caparica, Paris, Florence, San Diego, Bordeaux, Montréal, Bonn, Pittsburgh, Oxford, Geneva, New York City, Barcelona, Vancouver, Ames... and various places in Belgium (Louvain-la-Neuve, Leuven, Liège, La Roche, Mons, Knokke, Daverdisse, Spa, Namur...).

- Linear algebra with applications (MAT202), instructor, Spring 2016, 2017
- Numerical methods (MAT321), instructor, Fall 2016

- Mathématiques 1 (FSAB1101), TA, autumn 2008, autumn 2009
- Projet 1 (FSAB1501), TA, autumn 2010
- Théorie des Matrices (INMA2380), TA, spring 2011, autumn 2013
- Signaux et Systèmes (LFSAB1106), TA, autumn 2011
- Analyse numérique : approximation, interpolation, intégration (LINMA2171), TA, autumn 2011 and 2012
- Mathématiques 2 (LFSAB1102), TA, spring 2012
- Modélisation et analyse des systèmes dynamiques (LINMA2370), TA, autumn 2012
- Projet en ingénierie mathématique (LINMA2360), TA, spring 2012 and 2013
- Projet en mathématiques appliquées (LINMA1375), TA, spring 2013
- Systèmes dynamiques non linéaires (LINMA2361), TA, autumn 2013