The script or plan for my talk linking the "ideal money" with the choices and actions of "thrift" or "savings" by persons or by "economic agents" was influenced by concerns that it would be wise not to speak too incautiously of "the Keynesians" when the times are such that massive public opinions may be supporting actions by which a state administration can act without going through the parliamentary processes to write new legislation. So in the rush of political campaigns and elections (for example in the USA) it is difficult to sell a national monetary policy which, if followed consistently on a "long run" level, would result in the specific nation state existing as if on a higher level of economic civilization. (For example, Sweden and Argentina might be usable, over a long time comparison, to represent comparable "economic civilizations".) Therefore, I had arranged for 2012 to talk more cautiously in relation to whatever would impact with "the Keynesians" and with the political interests relating also to the scholarly factions allied with (or forming) "the Keynesians". And this caution carries over naturally to 2013 also.